I am not inclined to invest the time or money in another stamp and a trip to the post office. In view of your
response to my previous letters I personally do not care if you ever see it. I will be sending it to a number of news media organizations, health
care entities, and regulatory and law enforcement agencies and intend to print a number or copies for distribution to members of the public.
Some time back the board saw fit to discipline a doctor by revoking his license. From the news accounts it would seem that the good doctor behaved
rather badly and I certainly would not knowingly entrust such an irresponsible physician with the my care or recommend him to anyone else but
apparently he did not maim or kill anyone. I leave it to the reader to decide if his punishment was appropriate.
Shortly before that action you received a letter from me documenting the actions of a doctor who did maim a patient (that would be yours truly) and
almost killed him. Only the intervention of my family - removing me from the facility - saved my life and five years later I remain severely disabled
because of his actions.
In your reply to my first letter you stated that there was not probable cause to bring charges of carelessness or recklessness to a degree that
shows utter indifference to the consequences that may result and that you did not believe that the board could meet its statutory requirement
of proving gross negligence
In your reply to my rebuttal you stated that you did not feel that it rose do the level of gross negligence.
I can put my professional resume and personal character references up against any member of the board or any other physician and demonstrate that
I am not a crazy person or malcontent writing letters because I am unhappy about something and that my qualifications to address this matter are
at least equal but that is hardly necessary given the evidence - I can prove every word. I sent you
documentation in the
form of hospital records and witness accounts proving beyond any doubt reasonable or otherwise that the doctor went an order of magnitude or
two beyond carelessness or recklessness and that his negligence was in fact criminal. The doctor sent you a vague rambling reply and I stopped
counting misrepresentations (falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus) on the first page and am inclined to doubt - insofar as one can judge from a single example - his mental stability and
intelligence and you took his word over incontrovertible facts.
The hospital's records alone demonstrate that he committed acts likely to cause my death and did result in my being a near invalid to this day.
I provided witness accounts of physical abuse ordered by the doctor. As I stated:
Dr.
REDACTED and the hospital were entrusted with a routine task of overseeing the recovery of a patient from an injury,
and instead almost killed the patient and left him permanently unable not only to work but to care for himself. Errors by the previous hospitals and
bad luck on my part made my injuries more severe but proper care by a competent physician would have been sufficient to ensure my recovery and he did as nearly as possible the exact
opposite.
As you did not contest my assertions (affirmanti non neganti incumbit probatio) which demostrate that Dr.
REDACTED's
actions were not only malpractice but criminal malpractice the only alternate explantion is that you just don't care.
I have communicated to the governor and attorney general the facts and evidence that in a health care facility with a statistically probable
patient death rate or one or fewer per year and Dr. REDACTED was the only doctor and held the title of Chief Medical Officer the annual patient
death rate was in excess of twenty. Whether they will take appropriate action I have no idea but this doctor whom you you refused to discipline or apparently even bother to investigate is still practicing
medicine in Arkansas.
I sign this with a pseudonym known to only a few people but those who receive this by email will have my email address and I will upon request provide
my identity and credentials and any other relevant information requested. Whether or not I provide the name of Dr. REDACTED
will depend upon consultation with my attorney - it is easy enough for any who care to try to find out. Permission is granted to news media organizations wishing to publish. This
letter was composed on the fifth anniversary of the beginning of my ordeal
and for the past four years - after I became sufficiently recovered to do so - I have been investigating this matter and have a considerable amount
of documentation and witnesses to confirm my account.
Quiescent Benevolence
Thu Jan 15 2026 15:53:27 CST 1768514007